Sofia Shapatava vs Gina Marie Dittmann Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• Second Serve Performance: Recently, Shapatava slightly outperforms Dittmann with 40.89% of second serve points won compared to Dittmann's 39.49%. Could this edge be decisive?
• Return Game Stats: Shapatava is again ahead, winning 50.66% of opponents' second serve points versus Dittmann's 49.45%, while Dittmann has the upper hand in first serve returns at 33.51%, compared to Shapatava's 30.79%.
• Under Pressure: Dittmann has managed to save 48.99% of breakpoints, slightly stronger than Shapatava's 47.56%. Might this small difference matter at crucial moments?
• Overall Performance: In the past year, Shapatava boasts a higher match win percentage at 60.44%, compared to Dittmann's 52.94%—a clear indicator of overall form.
• Surface Performance: Dittmann excels indoors on hard surfaces with a 67% win rate, while Shapatava also peaks on grass with the same 67% success rate, but struggles on indoor hard courts.
• Player Level: Dittmann and Shapatava compete primarily at different event tiers, with Shapatava showing better winning consistency at lower tier events.
• Opponent Quality: Dittmann has faced slightly higher-ranked players, with an average opponent rank of 366.22 compared to Shapatava's 399.73, indicating tougher competition.
• Deciding Sets: Shapatava is notably stronger, winning 63% of deciding sets, overshadowing Dittmann's 36% success rate.
• Break Point Conversion: Dittmann converts break points at 40.1%, while Shapatava follows at 38.91%, offering a minimal advantage on key opportunities.

Editorial Prediction (August 26, 2025, UTC):

Assessing second serve performance and return statistics, Shapatava appears to have a slight edge over Dittmann. However, Dittmann's superior breakpoint conversion and performance under pressure suggest potential for critical moments in the match.

Overall match history and quality of opponents signal that Shapatava has been more consistent, particularly at different tiers of play, which could translate to broader match experience.

The deciding set performance strongly favors Shapatava, who shows remarkable resilience late in matches.

Considering all factors, Shapatava seems better poised to secure a win, especially if heightened performance in the closing stages plays a pivotal role.